Victim’s Representational Right Under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
DOI
Access Status
This content is available Open Access.
To download content simply use the links provided under the Files section.
More information about licence and terms of use for this content is available in the Rights section.
Loading...
Type
Article
Date
Journal Title
Indian Journal of Law and Justice
Journal Editor
Biswas, Sujit Kumar
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of North Bengal
Statistics
Total views and downloads
Views
0Downloads
0Impact & Metrics
Authors
Advisor
Editor
Abstract
Within the entire gamut of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 rights duties obligation of various stake holders of the criminal administration of justice are delineated. Not to mention that the right of the accused/s are elaborately detailed. The Supreme Court and various High Courts throughout India in catena of Judgments have tried to maintain the balance between the discretionary powers of the investigating agencies and that of the person charged with the crime. One of the cardinal rules of any adversarial form of investigation which our country subscribe to, is to give the benefit of doubt to the person facing the trial and setting up his defence against the accusation. Conspicuous by absence in the debate is the right of victims of crime. The representational right of the victim under the Code of Criminal Procedure Code is a highly contested issue. Needless to say that the victim’s representational right has gone for an abrupt change after the gruesome and unfortunate Delhi gang rape case on December 2012 (also known as Nirbhaya case). The process involve in criminal justice system can be broadly segregated into four distinct features as investigation, inquiry, trial and thereafter appeal if any after the criminal law is set in motion. The State as the omnipotent protector of its citizen and all people at large prosecute in criminal cases. A prosecution takes place through a Public Prosecutor or an Assistant Public Prosecutor depending upon the case that is tried and the Court where the proceedings are going on. Here comes the crux of the problem, is the victim’s voice ventilated, their rights represented, their interest protected. The representational right of the victim needs to be also examined in purview of the context that for the State and Judiciary many a times plays a balancing act and whether the same is compromised against the victim rights. The article also deep dives whether any fundamental changes are brought forth in the Bharatiya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred as BNSS, 2023).
Description
Citation
Accession No
Call No
Book Title
Edition
Volume
ISBN No
Volume Number
16
Issue Number
2
ISSN No
0976-3570
eISSN No
Pages
Pages
361 - 373