University Publications

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/2863

Browse

Filters

2020 - 20243

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Has files: YesSubject: search.filters.subject.Copyright

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Deepfakes on Copyright Law- Inadequacy of Present Laws in Determining the Real Issues
    (University of North Bengal, 2024-03) Nath, Aranya; B., Sreelakshmi
    We are in the 21st century, where rapid development of deep fakes technology led to cause harmful consequences justifies some form of regulation. The proposed laws are diverse, addressing many hazards linked with deep fakes. Rather than exploring the field, this Article investigates solutions to a specific set of concerns relating to national security. The interests are concerned with challenges to our social order. A bad actor may use deep fakes to exploit societal differences, destabilize political discussion, and erode faith in political institutions. The ensuing concrete harms might have far-reaching consequences for campaign reform, military operations, and intelligence collection missions, among other things. This Article discusses the legal and constitutional restrictions on any law aiming at legislating deep fakes and the issues related to national security.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Artificial intelligence: copyright and authorship/ownership dilemma?
    (University of North Bengal, 2022-09) Chaudhary, Gyandeep
    Along with new creative opportunities, various new legal challenges have been created with the introduction of sophisticated Artificial Intelligence (AI). Computer programs like Google’s Deep Dream create unique and intricate artworks, which is hard to distinguish from human creations. The law is not unaware of artificial intelligence problems; our legal framework is not developed to resolve AI’s rapid development issues. The problem is that our legal system has no answers to apparently uncomplicated questions such as “Who is the creator of a machine-produced painting using AI?” The law does not ignore artificial intelligence problems; our legal framework has not been developed to resolve concerns relating to rapid AI development. Modern copyright laws have been drafted in such a fashion as to take originality into account as a manifestation of the author’s identity, while originality is one of the necessary conditions for copyright subsistence. So, what if we get the personality out of the equation? Do machines create works without copyright? Do we have to amend the copyright law in order to incorporate AI under its ambit? This article will explore these and other questions and potential solutions to the existing problem at hand; who is the author in the case of AI-generated works?
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Expression Dispute under Copyright Law: A Synthesis Study
    (University of North Bengal, 2020-03) Ghosh, Rima
    Copyright inherently counteracts writers and publishers' conditions for regulating and paying their use of work against the reader and user demands for unlimited access to works at minimum or no cost. Indeed, the fundamental reason for copyright is to prevail over and above the added expenses which copyright monopolies on the public, arising mainly from the monopolistic collection of legal rights, which provide the requisite economic incentives to create and disseminate artistic and intellectual works. The public benefit is the wide variety of creative and academic works and their broad dissemination. There are two types of general expenses: the extra copying expenses and the right to use copyrighted works whose costs are set by the proprietor, and the limits on the use of the previous work in order to produce more works are not to be feared by any healthy competition. The costs and advantages of the copyright system will also change,like the elements of copyright affecting the balance.This work focuses in particular on copyright law, which discusses both the public and the rightsholders' conflicting needs. Any part of copyright law was regulated by idea speech.