Indian Journal of Law and Justice, Vol. 11, No. 02

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3667

EDITORIAL

Law has been a dynamic concept all the time. It has various dimensions depending upon the period of time as well as its applicability to the nature of society in which it is to operate. The basic concepts of law remain changing with the changing situation of the social norms, the political strategy and the needs of the common man. The rule of law is the slogan of the day may it be on one side or the other. The act which is legal today may be an offence tomorrow and the vice-versa. At the same time an act which is legal in one part of the world may be a crime in other part of the world. Even in a country a “Law” may be valid in a part of its territory may be illegal and punishable in the other part. The law cannot be studied in isolation. In such a decimal context a common man wonders about to learn what is the true law? The answer of the question cannot be given on looking at the statutory law alone. One has to draw the conspectus of the legislative enactment, judicial interpretation and the opinion of the jurists. It is a sheer paradox that everyone is supposed to know the law of the land while the fact remains that now a days nobody knows the whole law of the land. The Legislators, in general, make law, the judges interpret it and the academics teach it in addition to study analysis and research. Even then the ambiguity remains unclear after repeated amendments. This problem poses a complex issue before a modern man how to know the “law in force”. The only solution may be found in deep analysis and research on various aspects of the law. A humble attempt has been made by bringing out the present publication.

The Department of Law, University of North Bengal, although a recent centre of legal education in comparison to others in North India, has played a significant role. The academic excellence of any institution may be judged by the achievements of its students and performance of its teachers in addition to the given infrastructure and the facilities available for such goals. Present shape of the journal has been the product of a long process and initiatives undertaken by our faculty members. The present publication is the testimony to the fact which will go a long way in spreading the inference of multi-faceted research in various fields of law. That may be the source of knowledge on some of the areas of legal discussion.

For a long time we are thinking about to publish a law journal from our department. The ideas were on our mind for a couple of years, to give it a present form that have been possible today. In this academic venture the moral support given by our former Vice-Chancellor Professor Arunabha Basumajumdar is commendable at the same time the journal could see the light of the day by the support of my esteemed colleagues, in particular, and the whole academic world in general. Over and above to maintain the above spirit, it is not enough, the continual research and publication is necessary. I have firm belief that I would be able to fulfil the need of the hour by your constant support. Such kind of level of confidence in our mind became possible mainly because of successfully completion of number of national and international seminars and conferences by our Department with overwhelming participation and support from every part of our country and also from different countries including SAARC countries.

We firmly believe on one principle that our journal should ideally be a platform for exchange of ideas and dissemination of information not only from established legal luminaries but also for the young faculties and researchers in the field of law and allied subjects who will be the future leaders in the field of legal education in our country.

The present issue of the journal may have some errors and I academically take responsibility for the same in the given circumstances. I would welcome any suggestion and opinion for improvement for the next issue of the journal.

Prof. (Dr.) Gangotri Chakraborty
Chief Editor

Browse

Filters

20203

Advanced Search

Filter by

Settings

Subject: search.filters.subject.Constitution

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Right to Privacy as a Fundamental Right in Absence of Express Statutory Provisions: A Critical Analysis of Justice K.S.Puttaswamy (Retd.) V. Union of India
    (University of North Bengal, 2020-09) Misra, Bibhabasu
    Inalienable rights are inherent in Human called as natural rights as for example “Right to privacy.” Positive law made by legislature regulate it according to States’ reasonable necessity. These limitations are mentioned in the Constitution itself. In India, right to privacy has been recently recognised by the Supreme Court. In India there was a bill related to Right to privacy. The judgments of the Court are mainly corrective in nature and enforceable by the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Civil Contempt and Criminal Contempt.) or with the help of Article 142 and 144 of Indian constitution. In absence of specific legislation, we can read the right to privacy in statutes like IPC, CRPC, Easement, etc. If we file a petition under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; it will generate procedural difficulties, that is permission needs to be taken from Advocate General. Thus, corrective approach of the Court is only remedy in absence of express statutory provisions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief
    (University of North Bengal, 2020-09) Naveed Naseem; Qayoom, Shaista
    For efficient working of a republican setup rooted totally on Rule of law, an unbiased and impartial judiciary is indispensable. The percept of judicial independence and impartiality has brought greater significance in the countries with written constitutions, where the executive has been conferred with wide authority to sprint the government and the likelihood of abuse of such power is considerably high. In a country like India where judiciary is regarded as the watchdog of democracy, it undoubtedly becomes essential that judges in their individual capacities and the judiciary as a whole are unbiased and neutral of all interior and exterior influences in order to guard and shield the philosophical and conceptual phrases used in the preamble of the Indian Constitution. Besides, an impartial and independent choice mechanism is a sure safeguard for ensuring that persons with dubious integrity do not occupy high judicial offices, thereby enhancing public’s have faith and self assurance in justice delivery mechanism of the country. Considering the significance which an unelected judiciary wheels in our system, the screening of judges to man the superior courts cannot be confined to mere technical and professional competence and their approaches and philosophies have to be screened extensively. The paper attempts to reflect the significance adhered to the principle of independent and impartial judiciary and the urgency to defend and hold such standards earlier than its dimensions turn into just indistinct and academic concepts. The continuous government stalling in the appointment of judges to the Superior Courts, nominating judges to political offices and occasionally unscrupulous conduct by some judges in the recent past, where judiciary on most part seemed to side with the executive, has raised questions on independent and impartial identity of judiciary. Should we permit the constitutional democracy to live to tell the tale or the authoritarian rule to be allowed is these days the important query before the masters of the country.
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Using Leniency Effectively in Anti-Cartel Investigations: A Study of Recent Trends in Cases Decided by the CCI
    (University of North Bengal, 2020-09) Ray chaudhuri, Tilottama
    The Directive Principles of State Policy as enshrined in Article 39 of the Constitution of India lay down, inter alia, that the State shall direct its policy towards securing that the operation of the economic system does not result in concentration of wealth, to the common detriment. However, a study of the Indian market, decades after the enactment of the Constitution, reveals that the same is prone to wealth concentration, due to the concentration of production and supply of goods and services. A classic manner in which such concentration occurs is through the formation of cartels. Generally speaking, cartels are covert arrangements between competitors to eliminate rivalry amongst themselves, in the market. Cartels are lucrative agreements because if a cartel flourishes then the total profits made by the participants of the cartel would be higher than the individual profits made by them in a competitive market. Cartels act like a single firm monopoly and are prohibited the world over because of the damaging effects they have on the economy.2 In India, the MRTP Act, 1969, was enacted to give effect to the directive enshrined in Article 39 of the Constitution of India. However, the MRTP Act became redundant due to various reasons, including economic reforms like liberalization and globalization. India’s present law, the Competition Act, 2002, aims to curb cartelization effectively. With the use of contemporary tools like leniency programmes, the Competition Commission of India is encouraging cartel members to co-operate in anti-cartel investigations, resulting in crackdown of cartels in various important sectors of the economy. This paper analyses the impact of cartels on the economy and the measures being taken by the Competition Commission of India to deter cartelisation, by grant of leniency to whistleblowers.