Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief

DOI

Access Status

Thumbnail Image

Type

Article

Date

2020-09

Journal Title

Indian Journal of Law and Justice

Journal Editor

Bandyopadhyay, Rathin

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

University of North Bengal

Statistics

Total views and downloads
Views
225
Downloads
213

Citation

Naveed Naseem, & Qayoom, S. (2020). Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 11(2), 302–318. https://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3685

Authors

Naveed Naseem
Qayoom, Shaista

Advisor

Editor

Abstract

For efficient working of a republican setup rooted totally on Rule of law, an unbiased and impartial judiciary is indispensable. The percept of judicial independence and impartiality has brought greater significance in the countries with written constitutions, where the executive has been conferred with wide authority to sprint the government and the likelihood of abuse of such power is considerably high. In a country like India where judiciary is regarded as the watchdog of democracy, it undoubtedly becomes essential that judges in their individual capacities and the judiciary as a whole are unbiased and neutral of all interior and exterior influences in order to guard and shield the philosophical and conceptual phrases used in the preamble of the Indian Constitution. Besides, an impartial and independent choice mechanism is a sure safeguard for ensuring that persons with dubious integrity do not occupy high judicial offices, thereby enhancing public’s have faith and self assurance in justice delivery mechanism of the country. Considering the significance which an unelected judiciary wheels in our system, the screening of judges to man the superior courts cannot be confined to mere technical and professional competence and their approaches and philosophies have to be screened extensively. The paper attempts to reflect the significance adhered to the principle of independent and impartial judiciary and the urgency to defend and hold such standards earlier than its dimensions turn into just indistinct and academic concepts. The continuous government stalling in the appointment of judges to the Superior Courts, nominating judges to political offices and occasionally unscrupulous conduct by some judges in the recent past, where judiciary on most part seemed to side with the executive, has raised questions on independent and impartial identity of judiciary. Should we permit the constitutional democracy to live to tell the tale or the authoritarian rule to be allowed is these days the important query before the masters of the country.

Description

Citation

Accession No

Call No

Book Title

Edition

Volume

ISBN No

Volume Number

11

Issue Number

2

ISSN No

0976-3570

eISSN No

Pages

Pages

302 - 318

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By