Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief
DOI
Access Status
This content is available to Open Access.
To download content simply use the links provided under the Files section.
More information about licence and terms of use for this content is available in the Rights section.
Type
Article
Date
2020-09
Journal Title
Indian Journal of Law and Justice
Journal Editor
Bandyopadhyay, Rathin
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of North Bengal
Statistics
Total views and downloads
Views
225Downloads
213Citation
Naveed Naseem, & Qayoom, S. (2020). Judicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief. Indian Journal of Law and Justice, 11(2), 302–318. https://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3685
Authors
Naveed Naseem
Qayoom, Shaista
Advisor
Editor
Abstract
For efficient working of a republican setup rooted totally on Rule of law, an unbiased
and impartial judiciary is indispensable. The percept of judicial independence and
impartiality has brought greater significance in the countries with written constitutions,
where the executive has been conferred with wide authority to sprint the government
and the likelihood of abuse of such power is considerably high. In a country like India
where judiciary is regarded as the watchdog of democracy, it undoubtedly becomes
essential that judges in their individual capacities and the judiciary as a whole are
unbiased and neutral of all interior and exterior influences in order to guard and shield
the philosophical and conceptual phrases used in the preamble of the Indian
Constitution. Besides, an impartial and independent choice mechanism is a sure
safeguard for ensuring that persons with dubious integrity do not occupy high judicial
offices, thereby enhancing public’s have faith and self assurance in justice delivery
mechanism of the country. Considering the significance which an unelected judiciary
wheels in our system, the screening of judges to man the superior courts cannot be
confined to mere technical and professional competence and their approaches and
philosophies have to be screened extensively. The paper attempts to reflect the
significance adhered to the principle of independent and impartial judiciary and the
urgency to defend and hold such standards earlier than its dimensions turn into just
indistinct and academic concepts. The continuous government stalling in the
appointment of judges to the Superior Courts, nominating judges to political offices and
occasionally unscrupulous conduct by some judges in the recent past, where judiciary
on most part seemed to side with the executive, has raised questions on independent and
impartial identity of judiciary. Should we permit the constitutional democracy to live to
tell the tale or the authoritarian rule to be allowed is these days the important query
before the masters of the country.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Accession No
Call No
Book Title
Edition
Volume
ISBN No
Volume Number
11
Issue Number
2
ISSN No
0976-3570
eISSN No
Pages
Pages
302 - 318