Ross’s Version of Ethical Intuitionism: A Study in The Light of Moore And Kant
DOI
Access Status
This content is available to Open Access.
To download content simply use the links provided under the Files section.
More information about licence and terms of use for this content is available in the Rights section.
Type
Article
Date
2020-03
Journal Title
Philosophical Papers Journal of Department of Philosophy
Journal Editor
Padhi, Laxmikanta
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of North Bengal
Statistics
Total views and downloads
Views
99Downloads
86Citation
Bhattacharyya, A. (2020). Ross’s Version of Ethical Intuitionism: A Study in The Light of Moore And Kant. Philosophical Papers Journal of Department of Philosophy, XVI, 201–208. https://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4133
Authors
Bhattacharyya, Anureema
Advisor
Editor
Abstract
The prime focus of moral philosophy in the last four centuries had been the
relation of facts to values, specifically the ethical values. The issue evolved and
centered round the Humean view that ‘Ought cannot be derived from Is’. The
naturalist philosophers attempted to define moral words like ‘good’ or ‘right’ in terms
of natural properties. G. E. Moore in Principia Ethica criticized the naturalists’
intention of defining ethical terms with reference to factual properties. He elaborated
the issue and preferred to consider moral terms as in-definable and which refer to
some non-natural property knowable through intuition.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Accession No
Call No
Book Title
Edition
Volume
ISBN No
Volume Number
XVI
Issue Number
ISSN No
0976-4496
eISSN No
Pages
Pages
201 - 208