Social Trends, Vol. 11

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/5344

Editor's Note

A large group of young sociologists from different parts of India have been working together as members of the Research Committee (RC) 28 – Sociology of Everyday Life – of the Indian Sociological Society (ISS), exploring the nuances and essences of this fascinating subfield of the living discipline called Sociology. The RC members meet at the All-India Sociological Conferences (AISCs) held in December every year and at national-level seminars organized by the Research Committee in different parts of the country, in collaboration with colleges and universities, between two AISCs. Some research papers, thus generated, are selected and published in the volumes of Social Trends. Most of the papers selected for this Volume (Vol. 11, 2024) of Social Trends were presented in a two-day national seminar organized by the RC 28 in collaboration with the Department of Sociology, North Bengal University, and the Institute of Development Studies, Kolkata (IDSK) in the latter’s office on 27-28 June 2022. Prof. Prasanta Ray and Prof. Maitrayee Chaudhuri presented their papers as the keynote and valedictory addresses in the national seminar on “Freedom and Unfreedom in Everyday Life”, which was organized at the Department of Sociology, North Bengal University, in collaboration with RC 28 – Sociology of Everyday Life – of the Indian Sociological Society (ISS), on 19-20 March 2024. The paper by Dr. Lhamu Tshering Dukpa and Prof. Swati Akshay Sachdeva, a notable addition to this volume, is invited. We thus planned this volume of Social Trends as a special volume on “Sociology of Everyday Life”. Only one paper, that by Ramesh Kumar on Kabir panties, is slightly outside the scope of the main theme of this volume; however, it is an interesting paper on an interesting subject.

While exploring the “mundane, trivial, unconscious, uncritical and often unnoticed” micro aspects of everyday life of the differentially located individuals and groups, the contributors to this volume of Social Trends have unravelled the complex areas of subjectification and the “dialogical and dialectical” relationship between the subjects and the constraining forcesof the lifeworld. Borrowing insights from the rich body of social science theories the scholars have discovered how the mundane everyday life of the common people constitutes a social field of alienation, the “death” and “rebirth” of the subjects, both in individual and collective forms; they have recorded in their narratives on how the “unfree” selves strive for a freer space while negotiating, subverting and transforming the conventional structural technologies and institutions of subject formation and subjugation. The papers in unison argue that the subjects under no circumstances, even when authoritarianism looms large, lose their agencies since they record their sufferings in their cognition and regroup to express themselves in one form or another; they express their agencies in different shades and forms depending upon the levels of their precariousness, consciousness and “will to power and change” and, in the process, redefine themselves.

We hope the present volume of Social Trends will set the platform for the members of the Research Committee (RC 28) – Sociology of Everyday Life - of the Indian Sociological Society to explore new research terrains and add richness, substance, and methodological finesse to this subdiscipline of Sociology.

Prof. Sanjay K. Roy
Department of Sociology
North Bengal University
31 March 2024

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    Governance of Sleep: Story of Sleeping Bodies and Networks of Discourse
    (University of North Bengal, 2024-03-31) Saha, Ayatree
    This essay engages with the “government” of sleep that is constituted by discursive regularities as well as normative procedures. Sleep is not only regulated by the state but by different modes that involve the social as well as economic conditions. The essay uses a Foucauldian lens to look at the discourse around sleep and the technological interventions that mediate between human subjects and objects. It is in this context of neo-liberalism that this essay examines the governance of sleeper’s bodies imbricated within the nexus of power relations. With the coming of age of techno-social interaction, not only is sleep commodified but the universal necessity of it, is packaged within the 24/7 global productivity. Drawing from Michel Foucault’s concept of power and discipline, Bruno Latour’s idea of mediation via objects producing hybrids, and Simon J. William’s formulation of sleep, I argue for the kind of mediation that makes sleep a hybrid concept in itself. The essay constitutes the general conditions and problems of the “government of sleep” consisting of a more discursive and transcendental orientation to constitute the overall analytic of sleep as a field of control, mobilisation and suppression within modern capitalism. The essay lays out the specific technologies of the governance/ government of sleep that the grid of power in societies determined by conditions of capitalist production and extraction forge.