Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3547
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSen, Sudarshana-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-19T15:54:48Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-19T15:54:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020-03-31-
dc.identifier.issn2348-6538-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3547-
dc.description.abstractThe two intellectual and scholarly alignments, one with constructivism, logical induction and theory-building and the other related to positivism was reflected and manifest in two differing cerebral discourses. These intellectual alignments were rooted in different domains of philosophy of science reflected through different research paradigms. The result was a deepening divide between scholars who applied either quantitative or qualitative methods in their studies. In the late 1970s an initiative led to the publication of a Handbook of Mixed Methods in the Social and Behavioral Sciences further enriching the long struggle and intellectual reticence to mix differing and opposing philosophical flagships. This paper will take this struggle as a context and explore and analyze the emerging methods and the new philosophical breakthrough in social science researching particularly in the context of the study in everyday life.-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.subjectEthnographyen_US
dc.subjectMixed Researchen_US
dc.subjectTurning Points in epistemologen_US
dc.titleRedefining the contours : survey on the new methods used in social sciencesen_US
dc.title.alternativeSOCIAL TRENDS Vol. 7, 31 March 2020, p 29-39en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol. 07 (March 2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Vol. 7 March 2020_03.pdfRedefining the contours : survey on the new methods used in social sciences169.82 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.