Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4634
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSagar Ananda, B.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T08:25:44Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-15T08:25:44Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-
dc.identifier.issn0976-4496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4634-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, my aim is to analyze the theory of phenomenalism and its basic assumptions in the philosophies of Berkeley, Russell and Ayer. I will also analyze the way phenomenalism and its sense-datum theory has been opposed by Austin and Strawson. My main argument is that phenomenalism as a theory of reduction of the objects to sense-data can never be sustained because no such reduction is possible and that we can never give up the conceptual system in which the material bodies and persons are primary particulars.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.subjectPhenomenalismen_US
dc.subjectSense-dataen_US
dc.subjectSkepticismen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectCertaintyen_US
dc.subjectReductionismen_US
dc.titleOn phenomenalism: a critical anlysisen_US
dc.title.alternativePhilosophical Papers, Journal of the Department of Philosophy, Vol. XVIII, March- 2022, pp- 198 - 210en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophical Papers. Vol 18 (March 2022)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philosophical papers. Vol. 18 (March 2022)_15.pdfOn phenomenalism: a critical anlysis418.78 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.