Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRamthing, N.-
dc.description.abstractThis article attempts to foreground morality as categorical imperative. For Kant the categorical imperative is the fundamental principle of morality grounded on the idea of autonomy. He argues that an exclusive empirical philosophy can have nothing to say about morality, it can only urge us to be guided by our emotions or at the best by an enlightened self-love, at the very time when the abyss between unregulated impulse or undiluted self-interest and moral principles has been so tragically displace in practice. Kant believed that an action can only be morally worthy if it is performed in accordance with the categorical imperative, meaning that it is performed out of a sense of duty to the moral law. The categorical imperative must be universally applicable to all autonomous beings. And I agree with Kant that a principle which applies to all autonomous beings must be categorical imperative based on universal law. Morality, for Kant is fundamentally a matter of following the categorical imperative and such is a matter of acting from duty and not simply outwardly conforming to a rule because for Kant conformity to the moral duty is the practical necessity of a possible action as necessary of itself without reference to another end.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.subjectCategorical imperativeen_US
dc.titleMorality as categorical imperativeen_US
dc.title.alternativePhilosophical Papers, Journal of the Department of Philosophy, Vol. XVIII, March- 2022, pp- 91-99en_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophical Papers. Vol 18 (March 2022)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Philosophical papers. Vol. 18 (March 2022)_08.pdfMorality as categorical imperative444.01 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.