Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4133
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Bhattacharyya, Anureema | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-10-13T11:39:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-10-13T11:39:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0976 – 4496 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4133 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The prime focus of moral philosophy in the last four centuries had been the relation of facts to values, specifically the ethical values. The issue evolved and centered round the Humean view that ‘Ought cannot be derived from Is’. The naturalist philosophers attempted to define moral words like ‘good’ or ‘right’ in terms of natural properties. G. E. Moore in Principia Ethica criticized the naturalists’ intention of defining ethical terms with reference to factual properties. He elaborated the issue and preferred to consider moral terms as in-definable and which refer to some non-natural property knowable through intuition. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of North Bengal | en_US |
dc.title | Ross’s Version of Ethical Intuitionism: A Study in The Light of Moore And Kant | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | Philosophical Papers, Journal of the Department of Philosophy, Vol. XVI, March-2020, pp. 201 - 208 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Philosophical Papers. Vol 16 (March 2020) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ross’s Version of Ethical Intuitionism, A Study in The Light of Moore And Kant.pdf | Ross’s Version of Ethical Intuitionism: A Study in The Light of Moore And Kant | 643.84 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.