Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4103
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharyya, Anureema-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T09:49:47Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-08T09:49:47Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.issn0976-4496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4103-
dc.description.abstractAn important discussion in the area of metaethics is about the meaning of ethical terms which in turn relates to the epistemic status of moral judgements. The purpose of this paper is to understand the specific approach towards ‘meaning’ when there is a discussion about meaning of a term; thereby investigating the claim towards epistemic import of a judgement, if at all justified. The paper seeks to interconnect the two independent philosophical approaches to ethical language and hence prove that there is no convergence or divergence strictly as to relate the meaning of an ethical term with the judgement being cognitive or non-cognitive....en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.titleSemantic Import of Moral Terms: Cognitivism vs. Noncognitivismen_US
dc.title.alternativePhilosophical Papers, Journal of the Department of Philosophy, Vol. XVII, March-2021, pp. 377 - 388en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophical Papers. Vol 17 (March 2021)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Semantic Import of Moral Terms Cognitivism vs. Noncognitivism.pdfSemantic Import of Moral Terms: Cognitivism vs. Noncognitivism685.32 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.