Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4077
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Nirmal Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-08T06:25:30Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-08T06:25:30Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.issn0976-4496-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/4077-
dc.description.abstractWe know that Indian Philosophy, in general, prescribes for four puruṣārthas, viz., dharma, artha, kāmaandmokṣa. But the Cārvāka School accepts only two puruṣārthas, viz., artha and kāma, and rejects dharma and mokṣa altogether. Between the two puruṣārthas, kāma, the Cārvāka School says, is the supreme end and artha is the means to fulfil this end.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.titleCārvāka Hedonism: Some Critical Observationsen_US
dc.title.alternativePhilosophical Papers, Journal of the Department of Philosophy, Vol. XVII, March-2021, pp. 110 - 121en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophical Papers. Vol 17 (March 2021)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Cārvāka Hedonism Some Critical Observations.pdfCārvāka Hedonism: Some Critical Observations620.86 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.