Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3685
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNaveed Naseem-
dc.contributor.authorQayoom, Shaista-
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-15T10:45:29Z-
dc.date.available2021-02-15T10:45:29Z-
dc.date.issued2020-09-
dc.identifier.issn0976-3570-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3685-
dc.description.abstractFor efficient working of a republican setup rooted totally on Rule of law, an unbiased and impartial judiciary is indispensable. The percept of judicial independence and impartiality has brought greater significance in the countries with written constitutions, where the executive has been conferred with wide authority to sprint the government and the likelihood of abuse of such power is considerably high. In a country like India where judiciary is regarded as the watchdog of democracy, it undoubtedly becomes essential that judges in their individual capacities and the judiciary as a whole are unbiased and neutral of all interior and exterior influences in order to guard and shield the philosophical and conceptual phrases used in the preamble of the Indian Constitution. Besides, an impartial and independent choice mechanism is a sure safeguard for ensuring that persons with dubious integrity do not occupy high judicial offices, thereby enhancing public’s have faith and self assurance in justice delivery mechanism of the country. Considering the significance which an unelected judiciary wheels in our system, the screening of judges to man the superior courts cannot be confined to mere technical and professional competence and their approaches and philosophies have to be screened extensively. The paper attempts to reflect the significance adhered to the principle of independent and impartial judiciary and the urgency to defend and hold such standards earlier than its dimensions turn into just indistinct and academic concepts. The continuous government stalling in the appointment of judges to the Superior Courts, nominating judges to political offices and occasionally unscrupulous conduct by some judges in the recent past, where judiciary on most part seemed to side with the executive, has raised questions on independent and impartial identity of judiciary. Should we permit the constitutional democracy to live to tell the tale or the authoritarian rule to be allowed is these days the important query before the masters of the country.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.subjectDemocracyen_US
dc.subjectIndependenceen_US
dc.subjectImpartialityen_US
dc.subjectStateen_US
dc.titleJudicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Beliefen_US
dc.title.alternativeIndian Journal of Law and Justice, Vol. 11 No. 2, September-2020, pp 302-318en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol.11 No. 2 (September 2020)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Vol. 11 No. 2, Sept-2020_0976-3570_18.pdfJudicial Independence and Impartiality: A Sinking Belief265 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.