Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3562
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeri, Suraj-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-20T11:33:00Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-20T11:33:00Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-
dc.identifier.issn2348-6538-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3562-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explains the relationship between elite practices and elite claims. It argues that empirical focus on the discrepancy between elite accounts of their self and their practices can be one of the core areas of the methodological dimensions of elite research. It would demonstrate the complex of nature social inequalities and its reproduction. It concludes by arguing that field work in elite research can be made more fruitful by paying close attention to observational data and hence empirical research may look beyond “what is said” and to reach closer to “what is done”en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.subjectEliteen_US
dc.subjectpracticesen_US
dc.subjectspaceen_US
dc.subjectsubjectivityen_US
dc.subjectfieldworken_US
dc.subjectsocial inequalityen_US
dc.subjectstatesociety relationsen_US
dc.titleElites and Field of Power: Methodological Reflections from Bikaneren_US
dc.title.alternativeSOCIAL TRENDS, Vol. 6, March 2019, p 113 - 124en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Vol. 06 (March 2019)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Social_Trends_2019 Volume 6_8.pdfElites and Field of Power: Methodological Reflections from Bikaner517.67 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.