Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3562
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Beri, Suraj | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-20T11:33:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-20T11:33:00Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2348-6538 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.nbu.ac.in/handle/123456789/3562 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explains the relationship between elite practices and elite claims. It argues that empirical focus on the discrepancy between elite accounts of their self and their practices can be one of the core areas of the methodological dimensions of elite research. It would demonstrate the complex of nature social inequalities and its reproduction. It concludes by arguing that field work in elite research can be made more fruitful by paying close attention to observational data and hence empirical research may look beyond “what is said” and to reach closer to “what is done” | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | University of North Bengal | en_US |
dc.subject | Elite | en_US |
dc.subject | practices | en_US |
dc.subject | space | en_US |
dc.subject | subjectivity | en_US |
dc.subject | fieldwork | en_US |
dc.subject | social inequality | en_US |
dc.subject | statesociety relations | en_US |
dc.title | Elites and Field of Power: Methodological Reflections from Bikaner | en_US |
dc.title.alternative | SOCIAL TRENDS, Vol. 6, March 2019, p 113 - 124 | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Vol. 06 (March 2019) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Social_Trends_2019 Volume 6_8.pdf | Elites and Field of Power: Methodological Reflections from Bikaner | 517.67 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.