Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPradhan, Nandita-
dc.contributor.authorRay, Indrajit-
dc.description.abstractRationality and efficiency are often considered two sides of a same coin. Often we argue that in the absence of market failures, rationality always generates efficiency. The present paper, however, goes against this current of wisdom. It argues that rationality reflects the state of mind that determines the course of decision-making for an individual. Efficiency, on the other hand, conventionally reflects the financial results of an economic activity. But the human mind always desires more than what those financial outcomes provide. Therefore, rationality should not be identical to efficiency. This is the concept of ‘rational inefficiency’, or equivalently, ‘irrational efficiency’, which is theme of this article. It discusses in this context three important hypotheses, as developed in the literature on efficiency. Those are (a) the Quiet Life Hypothesis, (b) the Structure-Conduct-Performance Hypothesis, and (c) the x-efficiency Hypothesis.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of North Bengalen_US
dc.subjectIndustrial Organisationen_US
dc.subjectEfficiency, Rationalityen_US
dc.subjectMarket Structureen_US
dc.titleRational Inefficiency: A Discourse on John Richard Hicks, Joe Staten Bain and Harvey Leibensteinen_US
dc.title.alternativeANWESHAN, Vol. 4, No. 1, March 2016, p 34 - 46en_US
Appears in Collections:Vol. 4 No. 1 (March 2016)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Article-2.pdfRational Inefficiency: A Discourse on John Richard Hicks, Joe Staten Bain and Harvey Leibenstein427.33 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Items in NBU-IR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.